糖心传媒

Skip to content
From the Magazine

Office hours with Gretchen Helmke

FOR SHE糖心传媒橲 A GUGGENHEIM FELLOW: Gretchen Helmke, the Thomas H. Jackson Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Political Science, in her office at Harkness Hall. (糖心传媒 photo / J. Adam Fenster)

The 2025 Guggenheim Fellow on turning a passion for reading and writing into a career solving our most vexing political puzzles.

I didn糖心传媒檛 come from an academic family. I didn糖心传媒檛 really know what the job description for a professor of political science entailed. What I did know was that I loved reading and thinking about the world.

When I got to Berkeley in the late 1980s, things were shifting politically on a global scale. It was an optimistic period: The Berlin Wall came down, apartheid was ending, and Latin America糖心传媒檚 military dictatorships were collapsing. The 糖心传媒渢hird wave糖心传媒� of democratization was really a triumph of liberal democracy, and I wanted to understand why, why now, and how long could it last?

I really didn糖心传媒檛 have a grand plan to become a professor. I just wanted to keep asking questions, keep reading, and keep learning about how to study politics. It wasn糖心传媒檛 obvious to me how any of these things worked professionally, but, luckily, I had great mentors. Being guided at the right moment can change the entire trajectory of a life.

The book that really shaped me as a graduate student was by Adam Przeworski. I still assign it in almost every class I teach. At Berkeley, where I started as a graduate student, the training had leaned more toward history, typologies, conceptualizing, path dependence, and critical junctures (the idea that past events and historical processes create conditions that set countries on certain paths and make certain outcomes more or less likely).

 

Poltical science professor Gretchen Helmke at her desk with her laptop and bookshelves behind her.
BY THE BOOK: Gretchen Helmke糖心传媒檚 love of reading is reflected in her office decor. (糖心传媒 photo / J. Adam Fenster)

 

The professors at the University of Chicago, where I transferred in my second year of graduate school, showed me another way of thinking about how to study politics糖心传媒攖o focus on how institutions shape individuals糖心传媒� incentives and the ways in which people interact strategically. That was exactly the approach that had originally been pioneered at URochester in the 1960s. By the 糖心传媒�90s, it was being used by these phenomenal people who studied comparative politics at Chicago, including my mentor, Susan Stokes, who is this year糖心传媒檚 president-elect. The approach she and others taught was much more intuitive to me, and I felt I could really build on that.

If I could redesign one US political institution, it would be the Electoral College, hands down. We糖心传媒檙e the only country in the world that still has one, and there糖心传媒檚 really no rhyme or reason for it. It can distort the popular vote, it糖心传媒檚 vulnerable to manipulation, and it gives the presidency糖心传媒攁n office that over the last few decades has already seen a tremendous concentration of power because of Congress糖心传媒檚 dysfunction糖心传媒攁 shaky democratic foundation. It糖心传媒檚 rare that you have an institution that is so bad that there糖心传媒檚 no downside to reforming it. But this is definitely one of them. I糖心传媒檇 replace it with a system where the candidate who wins the most votes nationally becomes president. That principle is really important for rebuilding trust in our democracy.

What keeps me passionate about my work is the chance to draw connections between ideas. I love taking a theoretical framework from one context and seeing how it can illuminate a completely different problem. Or noticing when something everyone assumes about politics has a neglected but important flip side. That kind of intellectual puzzle is deeply satisfying.

As I got older and became a , I found that it糖心传媒檚 equally satisfying to teach that approach. Watching students light up when they see how these tools or models can unlock a political puzzle糖心传媒攖hat never gets old.

And then there糖心传媒檚 the other piece: balance. Academic life requires solitude and focus, but it also demands interaction and engagement. The trick is to have both. Fellowships and my work with and the are all attempts at balancing my inward, isolated academic work with the outward responsibility of sharing ideas beyond academic journals.

I feel lucky. Lucky to have had mentors who nudged me in the right direction. Lucky to be in a field where the questions never stop coming. And lucky that the things I loved as a child糖心传媒攔eading, writing, asking why糖心传媒攁re all part of my job description today.

Must-reads: A few of Gretchen Helmke糖心传媒檚 favorite books


By Neil Postman

糖心传媒淲ritten in 1985, this is really a precursor to today糖心传媒檚 social media and the Internet. Postman writes about television and what it does to the way we think, creating a spectacle of the news, and how we process information. I really wanted to understand what the current generation of teenagers and young adults is facing in terms of demands on their attention, and how they and we navigate them.糖心传媒�



By Leo Tolstoy

糖心传媒淚 love reading novels but usually don糖心传媒檛 have time for something like this during the school year. During the summer break, I read this one for two hours every day.聽It糖心传媒檚 phenomenal.糖心传媒�



Edited by Joan Reardon

糖心传媒淭he letters trace Child糖心传媒檚 evolution from just being the wife of somebody to becoming this incredible cookbook author, but also her friendship with the woman who was the editor for the series. It made me appreciate the art of deep, reflective letter writing, which has basically been lost.糖心传媒�



By Sarah Bakewell

糖心传媒淚t糖心传媒檚 a kind of creative biography of Montaigne, who was the first to engage in self-reflective essay writing. Bakewell presents the various answers he gives to the question of how to live糖心传媒攆rom table manners to mortality. It糖心传媒檚 the cleverness of his answers and the breadth that he covers, and just the thoughtfulness and the honesty of them. I read the book a long time ago, but I reread a chapter probably every six months.糖心传媒�



By Katherine May

糖心传媒淚t糖心传媒檚 kind of her memoir糖心传媒攁 beautiful book糖心传媒攂ut also a reflection on just slowing down and not thinking of resting as a failure; just learning to take things a little bit more slowly.糖心传媒�


This story appears in the fall 2025 issue of Rochester Review, the magazine of the 糖心传媒.