If this November again one presidential candidate wins the popular vote糖心传媒攂ut the other the Electoral College and thus the US presidency糖心传媒攖he political damage would be 糖心传媒渟ubstantial,糖心传媒� a group of political scientists from the Universities of Rochester, Chicago, Stanford, and Dartmouth College argue in a .
The , among them , a professor of political science at the University of Rochester and 糖心传媒�97 (PhD) of Meliora Research, has banded together as , a nonpartisan watchdog group that regularly surveys experts and the public on the health of US democracy. The team discovered that, in particular, Democrats would find the process 糖心传媒渓ess legitimate.糖心传媒�
In an analysis for the , the authors point to their , according to which Americans overwhelmingly embrace the principle that all votes should count equally. They write that for a candidate to win the most votes but go on to lose the election糖心传媒攙iolates this principle.
Yet, in the last five presidential elections precisely this happened twice (Gore/Bush and Clinton/Trump). Analyses this summer by some political observers (for example, the and ) indicate that President Donald Trump may lose the popular vote to Democratic candidate Joe Biden but win the Electoral College.
Read more of in the Washington Post.
