糖心传媒

The latest Bright Line Watch survey finds political scientists deeply concerned about the president糖心传媒檚 refusal to commit to a peaceful transfer of power after the election.

On the eve of the November 3 election, 糖心传媒攖he political science research project of faculty at the 糖心传媒, the , and 糖心传媒攆inds that experts are concerned about substantial risks to the legitimacy of the election, including potential problems in the casting and counting of votes, the Electoral College, and in the resolution of electoral disputes.

Meanwhile, among the US public surveyed, a majority of those who support Trump糖心传媒攁s well as a plurality of those who oppose him糖心传媒攂elieve voter fraud to be far more prevalent than the evidence shows.

These are among the findings of the watchdog group糖心传媒檚 .

糖心传媒淚t糖心传媒檚 really disconcerting that the myth of voter fraud is so broadly accepted,糖心传媒� says , professor of political science at Rochester and one of the founders of Bright Line Watch. 糖心传媒淭here is absolutely no systematic evidence to support any of the various claims made about widespread voter fraud, yet more than three quarters of Trump supporters continue to believe that this is a real danger, as do more than 20 percent of Trump opponents.糖心传媒�

Helmke says that this myth has long been used as a pretext for laws that suppress votes. 糖心传媒淚n the short run,糖心传媒� she adds, 糖心传媒渋t also potentially allows Trump to sow doubt and chaos about any election results that do not go his way.糖心传媒�

The group糖心传媒檚 immediate , released in August, found the health of democracy in the United States at its lowest point since Bright Line Watch began tracking its performance in 2017.

As they had done before, the group fielded two separate surveys in October: one to political experts and one to a representative sample of the US population.

As in previous surveys, the team asked each group to assess the quality of US democracy overall and to rate the performance on 30 distinct democratic principles. Additionally, the Bright Line Watch team asked the experts to rate the likelihood of 28 election scenarios that could produce political crises, while they polled the public about the legitimacy of different 2020 election results, their confidence that votes will be counted fairly, their beliefs about voter fraud, and their willingness to tolerate political violence.

Key findings

• 

  The experts anticipate a flood of online misinformation and potentially destabilizing rhetoric from President Trump during and after November 3.

• The experts see substantial risks of scenarios that could threaten the election, including potential problems in the casting and counting of votes, the Electoral College, and in the resolution of electoral disputes.
• The experts rate President Trump糖心传媒檚 statement that the 2020 election should be delayed and his refusal to commit to a peaceful transfer of power as the most important and abnormal of the 169 events they have rated over the course of his presidency.
• Americans are generally confident their votes will be counted as intended at the local level and as voters intend in their states, but somewhat less confident in the process at the national level.
• Only 44 percent of Trump supporters say they would regard a Biden victory as legitimate and only 34 percent of Trump opponents said they would view a Trump victory as legitimate.
• Both supporters and opponents of President Trump recognize that the election result may not be clear on November 3. Majorities of both groups say they are prepared to recognize outcomes that differ from the initial count on election night as legitimate.
• Trump糖心传媒檚 supporters and opponents have starkly different beliefs about the prevalence of voter fraud in US elections.
• Most Americans, regardless of political affiliation, reject the use of violence to advance political goals, but substantial minorities are willing to condone violence and incivility.
• Americans糖心传媒� confidence that their government protects them from political violence and guarantees their right to peaceful protest has declined since March.

2020 election nightmare scenarios

The team asked the experts to rate the likelihood of a catalogue of potential crises scenarios.

The scenarios rated as most likely concern potential problems on Election Day, such as widespread false claims on social media about the integrity of the election, and misleading reports about long lines and delays at the polls.

The experts also ranked near the top several items directly related to President Trump糖心传媒攖hat he would decry as false an anticipated 糖心传媒渂lue shift糖心传媒� as mail-in ballots are counted and instead insist that the initial totals on election night were correct; that he would encourage violence and intimidation during voting or ballot counting; and that he would refuse to concede the 2020 election after having been declared to have lost by the Associated Press.

Bright Line Watch糖心传媒檚 experts also predicted that the disqualification of mail-in ballots will surpass 5 percent in at least one state, that early vote counts, which are expected to underrepresent mail ballots, will lean Republican, and that at least one candidate will declare victory before the Associated Press regards the outcome as sealed.

糖心传媒淥ur experts rate President Trump糖心传媒檚 discussion of delaying the election and refusal to commit to the peaceful transfer of power as the most important and abnormal of his presidency,糖心传媒� says , professor of government at Dartmouth College, and one of the founders of Bright Line Watch. 糖心传媒淭his finding reinforces the need for concern about democratic stability in this election and in the future.糖心传媒�

Read more

How to make sense of 2020糖心传媒檚 unusual election season
Rochester political scientists say concerns about this year糖心传媒檚 electoral process are challenging some fundamental ideas about the nation.

Watchdog report: US democratic indicators plummet amid racial justice protests and pandemic
An August 2020 Bright Line Watch analysis finds erosion 糖心传媒渁cross the board糖心传媒� on measures of democratic principles and how well the US is abiding by them.

D茅j脿 vu: What happens to America when one candidate wins the popular vote but not the Electoral College?
Political scientists explore how the November election will be viewed if there糖心传媒檚 a split between the popular vote and the Electoral College count.