Why this Book Should Win – The Author and Me by BTBA Judge Michael Orthofer
Michael Orthofer runs the 糖心传媒� a book review site with a focus on international fiction 糖心传媒� and its weblog.
– 脡ric Chevillard, translated from the French by Jordan Stump, France
Dalkey Archive Press
Obviously, two-time, back-to-back winner L谩szl贸 Krasznahorkai has made the biggest splash at the Best Translated Book Award in recent years, but several other authors have also proven to be more than one-hit wonders. So, for example, former winner (2011, for ) Tove Jansson features on this year糖心传媒檚 longlist, as do shortlisted authors from recent years such as Elena Ferrante (2014), Edouard Lev茅 (2013), and Jean Echenoz (2012). One more name that keeps cropping up is that of 脡ric Chevillard: his was longlisted in 2012, and a year later was shortlisted. So is 2015 the year Chevillard goes all the way, on the back of Jordan Stump糖心传媒榮 translation of his novel, ?
A book-length rant by a character who is served cauliflower gratin rather than the trout amandine he was expecting 糖心传媒� okay, perhaps it doesn糖心传媒檛 sound like the most promising material. And yet 糖心传媒� what more could one ask for?
Sure, the author admits, in a footnote well into the book, that maybe he糖心传媒檚 taking things a bit far:
(R)eally, a whole book against cauliflower gratin, what a ridiculous conceit, it糖心传媒檚 not credible, not for a second
He suggests, too:
No, the reader will surely prefer to see all this as an allegory, and will struggle to decipher it: that cauliflower gratin can only be a metaphor for the good old-fashioned novel still stewing in the kitchens of our literature.
Certainly, one can 糖心传媒� and probably does well to 糖心传媒� read this and more into the protagonist糖心传媒檚 arguments. But as in any good allegory, The Author and Me (and the cauliflower/trout debate) functions well on multiple levels: regardless of how deep or shallow the meaning, this is some fine raging on offer here.
Yet there糖心传媒檚 more to The Author and Me, too: as the title suggests, this is a novel that also plays some games with questions of the relationship between author and subject. In his Foreword, Chevillard insists he糖心传媒檚 out to prove his autonomy-as-author 糖心传媒� to show that he糖心传媒檚 the one in charge and differentiate himself from a protagonist who, he insists, isn糖心传媒檛 just a mouthpiece-cum-alter ego. Just to make things clear, he intrudes in the story-proper 糖心传媒� in footnotes explaining his position. Wanting to assert autonomy, and authorial authority 糖心传媒� and to show he糖心传媒檚 the better man (糖心传媒淭he author糖心传媒檚 mind is more spirited, bolder, and even more sensitive糖心传媒�, he claims, for example, just to be clear 糖心传媒�) 糖心传媒� he struggles to differentiate himself from his character. Eventually, he feels he has to put his foot(note) down more firmly, asserting himself in a secondary story (suggested title: My Ant) 糖心传媒� a forty-page excursion (all in that single footnote) following 糖心传媒� an ant. (No worries, the cauliflower gratin/trout amandine mix-up hasn糖心传媒檛 been forgotten: it crops up here as well.)
Oh, and for those who prefer their novels with a bit of a more conventional arc of drama and suspense, The Author and Me also offers 糖心传媒� murder! (Some readers may, indeed, wonder, as the narrator rants and rants endlessly along, at what point the Mademoiselle who is his silent, long-suffering audience reaches the breaking point and reaches across the table to start throttling him 糖心传媒� or perhaps suspect Chevillard-as-author will assert final authority by doing in his wordy creation himself 糖心传媒� but Chevillard follows convention only so far (not very; not very, at all) so there糖心传媒檚 some surprise here, too. (Indeed, as he hopefully notes in his final footnote: 糖心传媒淗e trusts that this twist will leave his reader agape, and, why not, stammering 奥丑补糖心传媒丑补糖心传媒�糖心传媒�.)
The Author and Me is a fairly slim (146-page) albeit occasionally dense (certainly literally so, in that footnote-story-section, some forty pages of fine print 糖心传媒�) novel that builds a tour de force on its simple premises 糖心传媒� cauliflower vs. trout; author vs. protagonist. Chevillard has considerable fun while he糖心传媒檚 at it 糖心传媒� and so then does the reader 糖心传媒� and shows incredible dexterity in what he does with his story. It糖心传媒檚 challenging 糖心传媒� in no small part because Chevillard refuses to give in to convention(s) 糖心传媒� to put up with cauliflower gratin! 糖心传媒� but rewardingly so.
has been engaged with 脡ric Chevillard糖心传媒檚 writing for many years: the first of Chevillard糖心传媒檚 books he translated was , in 1997; The Author and Me is the fourth. With its stylistic range and playfulness, Chevillard糖心传媒檚 writing, more than most, is surely not something either translator or reader can easily get comfortable with 糖心传媒� a 1997 reviewThe Crab Nebula, in The New York Times Book Review by Liam Callanan noting:
“‘Translation is entirely mysterious,’ Ursula K. Le Guin once remarked, and so is Eric Chevillard’s brief novel — his first to be translated into English. The mystery stems not from any conflict between the English text (by Jordan Stump and Eleanor Hardin) and the original French, but more from the translation from thought to page.”
The translation-challenges posed by The Author and Me are different, but no less demanding, and Stump has captured Chevillard糖心传媒檚 tone and registers (and the humor to it all) expertly.
Multilayered, though-provoking 糖心传媒� and very funny 糖心传媒� The Author and Me is a rich work, indeed deserving of serious consideration for Best Translated Book Award honors.

Leave a Reply