糖心传媒

logo

My Little War

The period between Flemish author Louis Paul Boon糖心传媒檚 birth in 1912 and the publication of his post-modern masterpiece Mijn kleine oorlog (My Little War) in 1947 saw Belgium ravaged by some of the worst wartime carnage that the European continent had experienced in centuries. Even as Hitler糖心传媒檚 advancing wehrmacht sent 25% of the Belgian population fleeing over the French border, memories remained fresh of the brutal German occupation of 1914糖心传媒攊ncluding its defining atrocity, the sacking of Leuven, during which the city糖心传媒檚 library of 300,000 medieval books was burned and the entire populace expelled. So to post-war Flemish readers, Boon糖心传媒檚 peculiarly brilliant novel appeared in the wake of two large wars, challenging a literary orthodoxy that tried to make sense of these conflagrations.

Mijn kleine oorlog is decidedly not an anti-war novel糖心传媒攁t least, not in the sense of Remarque糖心传媒檚 All Quiet on the Western Front or Zweig糖心传媒檚 The Case of Sergeant Grischa or Rolland糖心传媒檚 颁濒茅谤补尘产补耻濒迟, the sort of predecessors to which Boon is likely referring to when he writes to question the archetypal 糖心传媒済reat writer糖心传媒� who rises up to present the world with 糖心传媒渉is Book About the Great War糖心传媒攚ith capital letters.糖心传媒� Instead, the volume might be described as an anti-anti-war novel . . . if it even is a novel at all. A better description yet might be an anti-anti-war sketchbook. For what Boon has done in thirty-three brief vignettes is collect snippets of overheard conversations, press reports, unsubstantiated rumors and 糖心传媒減ersonal糖心传媒� experiences to generate a montage of the highly subjective experience of one ordinary laborer-turned-POW-turned-writer during the Second World War. Yet even the volume糖心传媒檚 subjectively is overtly orchestrated; this is not Virginia Woolf or James Joyce trying to capture the subtle workings of the human mind, but rather an author reminding the reader that he is feigning to do so. In one noteworthy example, after referring to multiple characters as 糖心传媒渨hat糖心传媒檚-his-name糖心传媒� and 糖心传媒渨hat糖心传媒檚-her-name,糖心传媒� Boon suddenly pretends to have recalled one of their names: 糖心传媒淲hat糖心传媒檚 her name came too,糖心传媒� he writes. 糖心传媒淲hat was her name again the one who was hit in the head with something the other day and died, who used to get so furious and denounce us as pro-German when we said the war would last five years . . . it was Mrs. Lammens!糖心传媒� Of course, the reader recognizes that Boon has not achieved this recollection in the moment. Rather, Boon uses this device to mock his modernist forebears and to remind the reader of his own pretenses.

In Boon糖心传媒檚 fictional universe, which occupies only a few small streets in a Belgian village, everything is true because nothing is true. For instance, Boon describes a fellow soldier pausing during a retreat through an abandoned dairy, with German gunners close on his heels, to rescue a goldfish from an overturned bowl. When Boon questions this 糖心传媒渨hat糖心传媒檚-his-name,糖心传媒� the infantryman replies, 糖心传媒淚magine you lived in that dairy, and got back after you糖心传媒檇 run away, wouldn糖心传媒檛 you be glad to see that your goldfish were still alive? Well?糖心传媒� Lest we read too much into this tale of minor heroism, several sentences later, Boon announces: 糖心传媒淎ctually, I made those goldfish up, that糖心传媒檚 what stories are for.糖心传媒� He then begins his next vignette with the caveat: 糖心传媒淏ut this isn糖心传媒檛 made up . . .糖心传媒� Who can really say? For an author who writes, 糖心传媒渢here糖心传媒檚 never any need to cook up any fantasy; the truth is fantastic enough,糖心传媒� no moment in Mijn kleine oorlog is ever definitively truth or definitively fantasy. Even the identification of the narrator, Boontje, with the author remains intentionally unclear. Boon writes that 糖心传媒淚f I糖心传媒檝e usually said 糖心传媒業糖心传媒� in this book, it was just a way of presenting things, what I really meant was 糖心传媒榶ou糖心传媒櫶切拇綌you, you poor man, exploited, scorned, spat upon, pacified with empty promises, who didn糖心传媒檛 have the courage to stand up for yourself . . .糖心传媒� In the current age of Thomas Pynchon and 糖心传媒渢ruthiness,糖心传媒� we may take this approach for granted. To Boon糖心传媒檚 Flemish audience of 1947, blurring the lines between Truth and fiction in this speciously cavalier manner may have touched too close to home, and initial sales were disappointing. After all, as depicted by Boon, many Flemings played both sides during the occupation; distinguish the heroes of the Belgian Resistance from the collaborators and Black Shirts remains an unfinished process to this day.

Critic Annie van den Oever has catalogued Boon糖心传媒檚 early influences, most notably Franz Kafka and the Femish poet and nationalist Paul van Ostaijen. According to van den Oever, Boon 糖心传媒渟aw himself as a link in a chain糖心传媒� of what she terms the 糖心传媒済rotesque literary tradition糖心传媒澨切拇綌those early twentieth century writers who broke open 糖心传媒渢he traditionally monologic novel.糖心传媒� Thanks to Anne Visser and the Dalkey Archive, we have a translation of Annie van den Oever糖心传媒檚 seminal 2007 biography of Boon, Het leven zelf (Life Itself), which holds forth the promise of revealing this link to English-speaking audiences. Paul Vincent糖心传媒檚 translation, which follows the more popular Dutch second edition, is as clear and funny and nuanced as the original, and does an impressive job of conveying many of the text糖心传媒檚 linguistic jokes and puns into English.

Despite its complex literary agenda糖心传媒攐r possibly on account of it糖心传媒�My Little War also stands out as a deeply moving, often unsettling work of fiction. Boon clearly recognizes that an author cannot challenge his readers糖心传媒� ideas unless he also engages their emotions. His motley crew of what糖心传媒檚-his-names, including 糖心传媒渢he very good and very amusing and very ugly Albertine Spaens糖心传媒� and the cigar-smoking turncoat shoe manufacturer Swaem and the tragic Canadian girl with a harelip, are drawn with such precision that one feels one can recognize one糖心传媒檚 own acquaintances in his depictions. In fact, Boon reflects near the end of the volume, 糖心传媒淭here are 36 people who think they糖心传媒檙e What糖心传媒檚-his-name, and eleven gentlemen who give this particular writer angry looks whenever they walk by because they recognize themselves in Mr. Swaem糖心传媒攁lthough he had only a symbolic Mr. Swaem in mind.糖心传媒� There lies the magic of Boon糖心传媒檚 technique: His falsehoods are more convincing than the truths of traditional fiction.

In a section entitled 糖心传媒淪elf-Defense,糖心传媒� Boon muses: 糖心传媒淚糖心传媒檇 like to suggest to my publisher that he set up an 糖心传媒楨veryone Write their Own Little War糖心传媒� contest糖心传媒斕切拇綔First prize a pipe!糖心传媒� (Note the allusion to Magritte糖心传媒檚 La trahison des images.) To a significant degree, we now live in that world today: Anyone can糖心传媒攁nd many authors do糖心传媒攚rite their 糖心传媒渙wn little war糖心传媒� narratives for the Internet. One can easily imagine Boon looking down upon us, smoking his own pipe and grinning.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam.