Political scientist Peter Regenstreif is remembered as an expert on mass media.

Faculty, alumni, family, and friends are remembering Rochester political scientist , an expert on Canadian and comparative politics, mass media, and public opinion, who taught at the ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½ for nearly half a century.
A scholar, for the Toronto Star, pollster, and consultant to the political campaigns of Pierre Trudeau and Brian Mulroney in Canada and Jimmy Carter in the US, Regenstreif died in Los Angeles on May 19 at the age of 85.
As a professor of political science and Canadian studies in the Rochester , he regularly taught a very popular course called Politics and the Mass Media. Indeed, the topic had such universal appeal that he regularly gave talks about it outside the classroom:
ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œWith the media, there is no truth, there are just appearances,ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� Regenstreif told a group of Rochester alumni and friends in Boston in 1988.
In the talkÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½”ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œA Short Course in the Black Arts of Manipulation,ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� that same yearÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½”he shared the ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œbald statementÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� he made every semester to his students: ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œThere is no fundamentally, nonideological, apolitical, nonparÂtisan, news-gathering and reporting system. Having taken this in, we are ready to understand the process.ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½�
, a professor emeritus in political science at Ohio State University who taught with Regenstreif during his own 35-year tenure at Rochester, recalls his friend and former colleagueÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™s ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œarresting insights,ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� born out of a deep interest in local, regional, and national politics on both sides of the US-Canadian border. ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œPeter bounced back between Canada and Rochester. He was very close to the ground; he knew where the bodies were buried,ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� says Mueller. ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œHe knew how things smelled, which often wasnÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™t too good.ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½�
Mueller describes Regenstreif as a lively and thoroughly interesting interlocutorÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½”one who married substance with wry humor. What made him exciting to talk to, says Mueller, was how his approach to political science differed substantially from that of many academicsÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½””more practicalÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� and less theoretical.
Despite wearing many hats, Regenstreif knew where his priorities lay, judging from an interview he gave to the student newspaper, Campus Times, in 1973ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½”a good decade after his arrival at Rochester. Calling his other jobs (possibly tongue-in-cheek) ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œtsoris,ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� he told the paper that ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œabove all, IÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™m most valuable as a professor,ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� adding that ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œbeing a professor is a marvelous opportunity to be judged on our merits, rather than on illegitimate criteria. ItÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™s a perfect job for a man who admits that he is very much of an intellectual.ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½�
Regenstreif joined the ÌýRochester faculty in 1961, originally as a research associate while still working towards his PhD in political science and government from Cornell University. Hailing from Montreal, Regenstreif earned a bachelor’s degree in economics and political science from McGill University. At Rochester he rose from assistant to full professor, teaching full time until 1992, when he reduced his teaching to take on more political consulting work. He retired from the University in 2009 to emeritus status.
The symbiotic relationship between politicians and journalists
Regenstreif regularly taught a popular class, Politics and the Mass Media, pointing to the symbiotic relationship between politicians and journalists: ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œThe politicians without the media to spread the word would be helpless. The media without anything to write about would equally be helpless. So they coalesce against us: the politicians using the media to send their message; the media in effect creating a filter for the messageÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½”a prism, if you like, refracting the rays into a different direction, a different form, a different coloration for the common man. So where do I, the ordinary citizen, fit in? How can I too use the media effectively? How can I understand what is going on? How can I make sense of these strange and marvelous things that take place almost daily, andÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½”we all feel sometimesÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½”uncontrollably.”
The author of Ìý(Longmans, 1965), he taught some of the largest and most popular courses in the departmentÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™s history, including Introduction to Comparative Politics and Politics in Canada, in addition to Politics and Mass Media. ThatÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™s where Gary Ciarleglio ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™89 first encountered Regenstreif, whom he considers one of his ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œall-time favoriteÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� professors.An All-American linebacker for the Yellowjackets football team in the mid-to-late-1980s, Ciarleglio graduated from Rochester with a bachelor’s degree in political science. After the team emerged from a multiseason rut, winning the first eight games of the season and beating Hofstra in 1987, Regenstreif reacted with an impromptu speech during class.
ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œHe knew who the football players in his class were,ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� remembers Ciarleglio, who was also a classmate of RegenstreifÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™s son Jeff. ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œIt wasnÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™t a long speech, but he made a point to acknowledge us in front of the class for a job extremely well done and for how it lifted the campus up.ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½�
Regenstreif was always actively engaged with the larger community. The University archive is chock full of notices for talks he gave on campus and beyond, often with provocative titles, such as ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œThe Media and the Presidential Process: Has the System Gone Mad?,ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� which advertised a public affairs forum in Rush Rhees Library in January of 1988.
, a professor of political science and chair of the department, remembers his late colleague for his ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œgood humor, voluble conversation, and incisive commentary.ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� Stone tells the story of how, for many years, Regenstreif had been in charge of reading out aloud the names of graduating seniors at commencement: ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œHe pronounced unfamiliar names with impressive boldness, leading students to believe that he had correctly pronounced every nameÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½”besides their own.ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½�
is survived by his four children from his first marriage, Anne, Mitchell (Ellen), Jeffrey (Mary Nicole), and Gail (Amy Siadek); his second wife Penelope Temkin, her two children Alexei (Amy DeVoldre Temkin) and Nicole Temkin (Ames Alexander) along with eight grandchildren: Anne’s daughter Rachel; Mitchell’s daughters Nina, Claire, and Grace; Jeffrey’s daughters Julia and Sydney; and Alexei’s sons Ashton and David.