A Rochester economist examines the pros and cons of school choice options, including charter schools and private schools.
One of the biggest decisions that parents in the United States make is about where to send their children for school from kindergarten through grade 12.
, an associate professor of at the 糖心传媒, studies the intersection of public economics and the economics of education糖心传媒攕pecifically, the topic of school choice. With a new school year already underway or on the horizon for many, he shares insights everyone should know about school choice, whether or not you糖心传媒檙e currently the parent or guardian of school-age children.
糖心传媒淭axpayers are now financing education at charter schools and, to some extent, private schools,糖心传媒� Singleton says. 糖心传媒淪o, there are very real concerns about the impact on resources at traditional public schools, and what that means for public education and society more broadly.糖心传媒�
First, what is school choice?
School choice refers to a set of policies that create options for families and students that are not directly linked to their neighborhood of residence.
The concept of school choice has changed drastically in the last three decades. Until the mid-1990s, it typically involved moving to a different neighborhood or sending a child to a private school at the parent糖心传媒檚 or guardian糖心传媒檚 expense. Then, in 1991, Minnesota passed the country糖心传媒檚 . In the three-plus decades since then, charter schools and other school choice options have proliferated.
Today, school choice means that parents can opt to send their K糖心传媒�12 children to:
- Public schools, where children are often assigned based on area school boundary maps and zoning.
- Magnet schools, which are a category of public schools that often focus on specific areas of study, such as STEM, and may have selective admissions.
- Charter schools, which receive government funding yet operate independently of state school systems and local districts. Charter schools are tuition-free and must accept all students who apply, as long as there is room for the students.
- Private schools, which are run by private, sometimes religious, organizations, charge tuition, and may be selective. In a growing number of states, voucher or scholarship programs exist that provide government funding to defray the cost of tuition for eligible students.
(Parents can also opt to homeschool their children, but Singleton limits his work to school choice policies adopted by school boards and governments.)
An important point to keep in mind, Singleton notes, is that in the United States, 糖心传媒渇ewer than ten percent of all students are attending charter schools, and maybe another ten percent attend private schools. So, by and large, most students are staying in the public school system.糖心传媒�
Safety is a major factor for parents when choosing schools.
In exercising school choice, parents consider a variety of factors when evaluating school alternatives. Says Singleton, 糖心传媒淧arents wonder, is this going to be a stable school environment? A safe school environment? Do the teachers care? Are they putting in a lot of effort? Are the school糖心传媒檚 values aligned with my own?糖心传媒�
Although it can be challenging to discern exactly what parents are thinking when choosing schools, 糖心传媒渢here糖心传媒檚 that one of the things they糖心传媒檙e concerned about is school safety,糖心传媒� he says.
School choice seems to benefit both individuals and the public education system as a whole.
On an individual or family level, a student may be assigned to a local public school that糖心传媒檚 not the best fit for them or that may not be a good school overall. 糖心传媒淪chool choice creates options for those students to find a better or safer school, or one that better matches specific values, such as respect, service, or compassion,糖心传媒� says Singleton.
On a broader level, school choice has what糖心传媒檚 called spillover effects. Exercising school choice potentially benefits not only the individual student, but also the students who stay in their assigned public schools. Why? Because school choice creates competition in the education sector.
糖心传媒淚f money is following students from public schools into private schools and charter schools, that creates incentives for public schools to retain students, so they糖心传媒檒l have to raise their productivity,糖心传媒� he says.
Of course, how exactly those positive spillovers manifest remains a major question in the empirical literature.
Notably, private school vouchers are not benefiting the students they were originally designed to help.
While private schools have long been a schooling option for families, explains Singleton, there are often barriers to entry, including admission standards or tuition fees.
Private school voucher programs use public funding to give students scholarship or other financial support to attend private schools. These voucher programs have historically targeted economically disadvantaged students attending low-performing public schools, explains Singleton. Yet the students who actually use such vouchers tend to be more advantaged, higher-performing students.
Why aren糖心传媒檛 more economically disadvantaged students using vouchers? The reasons are twofold, according to Singleton. The first is information: 糖心传媒淧arents and students may not know that they are eligible for vouchers or know how to navigate the process of redeeming it to attend a private school,糖心传媒� he says.
The second reason is access. 糖心传媒淛ust because a student is eligible for a voucher does not mean there糖心传媒檚 a high-quality private school that agrees that the school fits the student糖心传媒檚 needs. Also, transportation to private schools is typically not available to economically disadvantaged students,糖心传媒� he says.
Few high-performing students from disadvantaged backgrounds are applying to selective schools, such as magnet schools and private schools.
There糖心传媒檚 been a lot of discussion about how to make the student body in selective schools more diverse. What policies can be enacted to make such schools more reflective of a school district糖心传媒檚 student body?
Part of the issue, according to Singleton, has to do with students who are not applying.
糖心传媒淚f you look at students from disadvantaged backgrounds糖心传媒攚ho are often from underrepresented minorities糖心传媒攖hose students are much less likely to be applying to selective schools in the first place. These are students who we would reasonably believe would be very successful at these schools, but they糖心传媒檙e much less likely to be applying to those schools than students from other backgrounds. Why that糖心传媒檚 happening is an open question right now,糖心传媒� he says.
Some of the best evidence about charter schools糖心传媒� effectiveness comes from lottery situations.
Charter schools are not allowed to turn away students unless there are capacity constraints. If schools are oversubscribed, a lottery is held to determine who gets admitted.
These lottery situations produce random assignment, explains Singleton: 糖心传媒淭he students who get into the charter schools through a lottery serve as a treatment group, while those who don糖心传媒檛 get in serve as a control group.糖心传媒� Studies have shown that students who received lottery offers to charter schools ended up with better test scores and college outcomes compared to those who didn糖心传媒檛 receive lottery offers to those charter schools.
糖心传媒淭his conclusion, however, only applies to the specific lottery situations studied,糖心传媒� he cautions.
Charter schools don糖心传媒檛 necessarily outperform traditional public schools.
糖心传媒淭he average charter school is often not better than the average public school. In some cases, they糖心传媒檙e actually worse,糖心传媒� says Singleton, who bases this assessment on data estimates he糖心传媒檚 generated from Florida and North Carolina, two states with large numbers of charter schools.
He adds, 糖心传媒淚f we expand school choice, we have to take into account that not everyone is going to attend a high-quality charter school. Market factors may force some schools to go out of business, and there糖心传媒檚 some evidence suggesting those forces may be at work. Parents, however, may still prefer those schools for other reasons, such as values or safety.糖心传媒�
But charter schools do tend to improve student performance at nearby public schools.
This is likely for the same reason that school choice in general benefits public education: spillovers and market competition.
According to Singleton, the research indicates that when a charter school糖心传媒攑articularly one that emphasizes math and reading糖心传媒攎oves close to a local public school, the test scores of the students in the public school go up relative to the scores of public school students who do not live near that charter school.
糖心传媒淚f a charter school moves next door, the nearby public school risks losing students. As a result, the public school is going to increase its productivity, increase its effort, and hire better teachers,糖心传媒� he says.
So, while people are right to worry about the fiscal impacts of charter schools on traditional public schools, it seems the overall educational impact on public schools is positive.
Expect a very different school choice landscape post-COVID, says Singleton.
糖心传媒淭here was a lot of momentum for charter schools under the Obama administration, and there was a lot of stated momentum under the Trump administration that never really materialized,糖心传媒� he says. 糖心传媒淣ow, though, charter schools have fallen by the wayside as a priority in federal-level education reform circles.糖心传媒�
Some of that can be attributed to the legacy of the COVID-19 pandemic, which presented an unexpected shock to the school choice system as a whole.
糖心传媒淐OVID forced many families to evaluate if they were satisfied with their children糖心传媒檚 schooling,糖心传媒� he says. 糖心传媒淲ere they pleased with what was available, or were they going to seek alternatives? I think we糖心传媒檙e still seeing that quandary play out糖心传媒攁nd it糖心传媒檚 going to have longer-lasting effects than the pandemic itself.糖心传媒�
