from Bill Murphy, Vice President, University Communications
April 8, 2013
Many members of the University community have been offended by Professor Steven Landsburg糖心传媒檚 March 20 blog postthat poses hypothetical questions about the rights of an unconscious rape victim. They maintain that his questions can be read as condoning the rape of unconscious victims.
On April 5,聽聽saying in part, 糖心传媒淚 am both sad and sorry that my recent blog post has distressed so many people so deeply, both on campus and off. I am particularly sad because many readers got the impression that I was endorsing rape, while my intent was to say exactly the opposite糖心传媒攏amely that the horror of rape is so great that we should rethink accepted principles of policy analysis that might sometimes minimize that horror.糖心传媒�
Professor Landsburg made his post on his personal blog. It has no direct connection to the University. His views are his own; he does not speak for the University. The University disagrees with the content, which does not reflect its views or values.
In his remarks to the conference聽聽on April 3, President Seligman talked about the horror of cases in which unconscious victims are exploited. 糖心传媒淭he trauma that rape victims feel can affect their lives for decades in ways that can be emotionally devastating not only to the victim but to those who love her or him.糖心传媒�
