ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½

Skip to content
Society & Culture

The Poitier Effect: New book by film scholar examines ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½˜change without changeÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™

Sidney Poitier in 1967's To Sir with Love.

Sir Sidney Poitier became a cultural icon in the 1950s as the first black actor to break racial barriers in film. But as ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½ professor Sharon Willis argues in her new book The Poitier Effect (University of Minnesota Press, 2015), his image on screen creates a false sense of equality that continues to appear in the popular media and remains damaging to race relations today.

ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œPoitierÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™s presence in racially charged films during the 1950s and 1960s made him the go-to figure for white people who want to talk about changes in racial equality,ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� says Willis. ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œHis image is often used by people who want to assure themselves that they are not racist because they would invite a person like Poitier to dinner. But in reality, his relationships mirror black-white relationships seen as far back as in Mark TwainÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™s Huckleberry Finn, which shows blacks as being ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½˜patientÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™ with whites.ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½�

In essence, these images create what Willis calls the Poitier Effect, a function of white wishful thinking about race relations. ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œAs HollywoodÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™s first black leading man, Poitier came to signify to the white status quo a form of racial reconciliation,ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� says Willis. She points to his roles as a teacher overcoming the prejudice of students in To Sir with Love, and a detective in a racist town in The Heat of the Night. In both films, she believes that his restrained and dignified response to white ignorance and bad behavior contributes to a sense that race no longer matters. But as the author points out, events in Ferguson, Missouri, and Staten Island, New York, show that this is not the case. ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œThese recent actions show us that racial tensions still exist and that things have not changed to the degree that movies show they have.ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½�

Part of the reasoning behind WillisÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™s argument is that audiences have been conditioned over time to view films about race through a white narratorÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™s point of view, as seen in films like The Long Walk Home, Pleasantville, and The Help. She believes that films that show this ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½˜change without changeÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™ make it harder for films like the recent Martin Luther King Jr. movie Selma, to experience success. ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œIt was as if the mainstream public wasnÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™t ready to have the story told from the African American point of view,ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½� said Willis, whose hope is that readers of her book can use the Poitier Effect as a framework to apply when watching films. ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½œBy being able to take apart the too-satisfying solutions that so often end films about race, audiences will be one step closer to figuring out the true message behind them.ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½�

Willis is a professor of art history and visual cultural studies at Rochester, as well as the former director of the UniversityÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½™s film and media studies program. She is a co-editor of Camera Obscura and author of High Contrast: Race and Gender in Contemporary Hollywood Film, and Marguerite Duras: Writing on the Body, as well as many essays on film theory and cultural studies.